I realized when I wrote the script that, for once, I might be Accentuating the Positive too much... But I feel like the internet in general is too "one part is REALLY BAD, ergo the whole thing is REALLY BAD" sometimes. Whenever I watch Homer vs. Dignity, I'm always amazed at how great the first two acts are (mostly), and how downhill it goes when the panda rape comes along.
I love that the family actually needs money for once and that they're not millionaires. I like that they show them actually doing something about it (like getting financial advice) first, before Mr. Burns steps in. Chief Wiggum's speech about "retirony" is classic. Lindsey Naegle has some clever dialogue. Homer just throwing business cards at people is a good visual laugh. The Smithers musical is inspired.
I love Mr. Burns telling the vending machine not to wrap the toffee too tightly (because he's hungry now!). Love the pudding scene, from start to finish. It's a bit mean spirited, but it's silly enough to not be over the top (yet). The Comic Book Guy prank works in this way as well, also partially because CBG isn't a "nice" character anyway.
I feel like the episode would've been just fine if they would have gone as far as "Baby made a boom boom" and no farther. That's genuinely humiliating enough for them to make a point about Homer's dignity, so the panda rape is just icing on the cake that's not needed. And the less said about the fish guts, the better.
Oooooh, that's a good suggestion. It's probably the quintessential Mirkin episode to me, so it might be a good time to talk about that Mirkin flavor he brings.




Reply With Quote

I don't like this episode very much but it's always fun to hears your comment about an episode.


by: 



