http://www.gotfuturama.com/Informati...odeGuide/6ACV/ has this as the lowest rated episode. It was not that bad
5/5: The ratings came in from the future, you're a hit!
4/5: Alot of people like where this show will go!
3/5: Not many people are watching your show...
2/5" I doubt that it'll be a really huge slamming success.
1/5: That was the best Futurama commercial ever.
http://www.gotfuturama.com/Informati...odeGuide/6ACV/ has this as the lowest rated episode. It was not that bad




I'm guessing those review sections attract a lot of dumb pre-teen fans. I mean it wasn't the best episode, but when the most of the criticism amounts to "Too much focus on Leela" then you know it's not worth engaging with.
i don't see why everyone thought this was funny. you could see the big jokes coming from a mile away.
Originally Posted by tones
Not a bad ep (I saw it last night 'cuz I forgot it was on Thursday), but is it me or is Leela turning into a purple-haired, one-eyed Lisa Simpson????
So I went to take a look at the Peelified forum. There's an argument spanning thousands and thousands of words about whether the slurm queen being in the episode contradicts Fry and the Slurm factory.
/\
Well i guess it would contradict because it is meant to be the secret of slurm. But possibly the secret got out some time between FATSF and this but like fry were to addicted to slurm to care. And who cares that it comes from a worms behind, milk comes from a cows behind, honey comes from a bees behind and have you ever used toothpaste?




And I think one member states that the slurm queen is BEHIND the huge sign, so...
Last edited by Comicshow MolemanBob; 07-26-2011 at 05:51 AM.












(Some) people there care WAY too much about continuity and logic (even with really minor things) within the series. One guy went on quite a few posts complaining that the ending to "Cryonic Woman" violates continuity/logic in the series because Fry falls out of the ship at the end and his survival is never explained. And the worst part is the guy arguing with him was even worse.
Two eyes, two ears, a chin, a mouth, ten fingers, two nipples, a butt, two kneecaps, a penis. I've just described to you the Loch Ness Monster. And the reward for its capture? All the riches in Scotland. So I have one question: why are you here?
WHY DO THEY SOMETIMES HAVE WHEELS ON THINGS BUT IN MOTHER'S DAY THEY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT A WHEEL WAS
That's what Futurama is most of the time though. This wasn't a great episode but christ let them do something a bit different now and then.
it's not just "something different", it's becoming more and more frequent...








this wasn't that entertaining. a few chuckles, like leela's first story to the orphans, the spongebob parody (short and brief, but got a chuckle from me), everyone being too loud for leela.. it was pretty boring and leela was annoying.
the scene where leela wins the award reminded me A LOT of Angry Dad: The Movie.
Can't say I liked this one too much. Only laughs I got were from "Popular slut club", Feffernoose's spit-take and "YOU TOLD PEOPLE ABOUT THAT!?".
The plot was something that has been touched on before albeit very differently ("Bender should not be allowed on television", "That's Lobstertainment!")
It just felt like a very sub-par Futurama and also, while it was nowhere near as bad, I'm gonna have to put this in my least favourites of the shows revival period with "In-A-Gadda-Da-Leela" and "The Futurama holiday spectacular".
Just be thankful
1/5.. it was pure garbage, I was shocked by how bad it was.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
![]() |